Kronos Workforce Management Software

The Kronos Workforce Management system is one of the widest-adapted time and attendance systems in the world. The company boasts over 20,000 customers.


Kronos was founded in 1977. They created the first microprocessor-based time clock, in 1979, and reached $1 billion in annual revenue in 2014.


The company has continued to innovate, offering time clocks that broadcast videos to employees when they punch in for the day.


The labor management software offers powerful analytics, including costing information and employee oversight tools. Kronos supports HR and payroll functions as well, making it one of the more-rounded Time and Attendance systems available.

TSheets Time Tracking Software

TSheets provides current-world solutions for time tracking. If you’re looking for system that go beyond clock-punch, you may like their offerings.


This time and attendance company offers apps for multiple mobile platforms, supporting GPS location tracking. An employer can view who’s working and where in real time, which can be valuable managing employees in the field.


Additional options for clocking in and out include phone systems, SMS messaging, and a web portal you can access via a browser.


The TSheets system integrates with accounting and payroll systems as you would expect. The company is based in Idaho, and was started in 2006. The emphasis on current technology for labor tracking has led to fast growth for TSheets.

TimeClock Plus Labor Tracking

One of the longstanding Time and Attendance companies, TimeClock Plus has been providing attendance tracking systems since 1988.


TimeClock Manager is their administration module, providing the labor management tools. The system was designed to be affordable and yet powerful enough to manage workforces of 10,000 employees and more.


The backend of the system is a Microsoft SQL database. The front end options include web portals or various models of time clock hardware. They offer over 100 payroll interfaces.


This system has not been extended to provide HR administration or payroll processing. The company makes strategic partnerships where needed to meet business needs.

TimeClock Plus is not one of the flashier systems but its strong functionality has won it high marks in many reviews.

e-MDs EHR and PM Software Review

e-MDs is an ambulatory Electronic Health Record system, with Practice Management functionality as well.  


It was developed in 1996 in Austin, TX.


e-MDs has received accolades from AAFP, and favorable reports from KLAS. While the consolidating marketplace has decreased the number of independent practices, e-MDs has grown to over 50,000 users.


Their EHR solution has been developed with the intention of truly support provider workflows, generating readable notes, and capturing the needed data as efficiently as possible.
Like Athena, their system was built to be web-based, and compares favorably to much older technologies driving Epic, MEDITECH and others.

Athenahealth EHR Software Review

Athenahealth’s EHR has been a disruptive force in the health care IT industry, with an appealing payment structure, and new cloud-based technology.


The company is based in Boston, and headed by Jonathan Bush.


Athena will typically take over billing and collections for their clients, in addition to providing charting and other practice management features.


Their providers pay a percentage of net collections, which seems to indicate that athena has skin in the game. The more the practice makes, the more the vendor makes.


The unique EHR model allows athena to manage systems efficiently, when one upgrade updates all customers. It can also mean that providers get less flexibility, and any custom requests can be slow to be completed.
Athena’s largest disadvantage may be that they are a specialized product in a consolidating marketplace. As an ambulatory-only solution, they have been replaced in some clients by Epic or Cerner’s all-inclusive products. In response, athena does have an inpatient solution in development.


Meditech is an EHR company based in Boston.


One of the widest-adopted HIS system in the US, MEDITECH competes head-to-head with Cerner and often Epic.


The biggest strategic disadvantage was arguably the lack of an outpatient offering.


Until last year, MEDITECH offered acute system only. They were leaving money on the table as hospitals were forced to find secondary systems for their clinics. As of last year, MEDITECH began selling an Ambulatory module as part of their 6.1 system.


If the early adopters are successful and word-of-mouth builds, this could help MEDITECH square off more successfully with the other HIS system leaders. At very least, this can help them protect their market as they profit off the upgrades to 6.1.


eClinicalWorks Medical Record Software

eClinicalWorks offers a hosted EHR that has been widely adopted in the US.


The company is based in Massachusetts. They boast over 100,000 physicians using their system.


eClnicalWorks is focused on outpatient services only, not currently offering an acute system. They have had success selling into hospitals, offering interfaces between the inpatient and outpatient systems.


While they continue to grow, this could prove to be a weakness for them. Many hospitals systems are electing to implement systems with inpatient and outpatient capabilities, such as Epic or Cerner.


eCW leveraged their standardized pricing and efficient implementation processes in a deal with Sam’s Club. They offered their system for providers, paired with Dell equipment for a fixed price.
The emphasis on a best-of-breed ambulatory product has paid off with many FQHCs and standalone clinics signing with them. Even the NFL announced in 2012 that they were using eClincialWorks for their move from paper to EHR.

GE Centricity Practice Solution EHR

GE’s offerings are an assortment of EHR systems, purchased and rebranded under the Centricity name. There is no inpatient option, so this system makes the most sense for independent practices.

GE has a robust practice management and charting system. Their forms include everything needed to meet Meaningful Use requirements.

Centricity uses HTML and MEL-based forms. The freedom to create your own forms has historically been a strength. However, some of that advantage is lost as clinics work to meet PQRS and MU standards. They have to standardize forms to ensure data collection leads to populating the right fields for GE’s proprietary CQR reporting registry.

Easy EHR customization may be more of a limitation today than a feature.

The CQR reporting platform makes reporting to CMS easy, once the system has been configured to collect data in the correct fields.

The Oracle version (Centricity Physician Office) continues to receive version updates and service packs, but appears to be on life support.

The SQL platform (Centricity Practice Solution) has an updated user interface, and appears to be their preferred platform going forward. The PM and EMR integration is only available on this platform.

Ricoh Copier Review

The Ricoh copier brand is often ranked as one of the top digital copier companies, beside Canon and Sharp for energy efficiency and print quality.


Ricoh was originally a Japanese company, but is now selling around the globe. They entered the office copier industry in 1955 with the launch of the Ricopy 101, which created a larger demand for their first manufactured product, sensitized paper. Then, in April of 1987, Ricoh Corporation was founded in the US.


Ricoh has stayed current, releasing better, more advanced printers all the way up to their first 3D printer, released in October of 2015. This brand is famous for their gel-based printers, which decrease clogging possibilities and deliver a better flow of ink onto the paper. These printers contain larger nozzles than those of an Epson printer, but are still more cost-efficient, using less ink per inch of the paper.


Ricoh has a good reputation for creating simple copiers that can be operated fairly easily without professional support. Unfortunately this brand has also received reviews pointing to the slightly complex inner layout of these copiers, which made it more difficult to remove paper jams. If you have a printer that jams often, you may end up having to call in tech support to help.


On the opposite hand, Ricoh has repeatedly satisfied its customers with reliable machines that last for a long time without needing repairs or replacement parts.


When compared to Canon, Ricoh doesn’t quite match up to the ability of Canon copiers to create excellent color images. Still, Ricoh offers products for less money, that are good for small businesses, and businesses that require good copier performance, without the high quality images that make Canon copiers so much more expensive.


If you’d like to purchase a Ricoh copy machine, a good way to start is by checking out what others are saying about the models you’re looking at. Ricoh copier reviews are known to have a wide range of results, from highly recommending the printer, to regretting the purchase.

Konica Minolta Copier Review

The Konica Minolta copier brand provides a high performance copy machine at a very competitive price.


A portion of the Konica Minolta copier company has been around since the 1870s, and it still exists as one of the top copier companies today for its quality products and passionate customer-centered system. Konica was started in 1873, as a photographic and lithographic company. Years later, in 1928, Minolta began camera production in Japan. Minolta’s first digital copy machine, the Minolta Copymaster, was released in 1960, and finally the two companies merged in 2003. It was a great business move to combine their leading technology and business styles.


Konica Minolta continues today to make a long-lasting trust between them and their customers the top priority. In fact, the company has been recognised as the #1 brand for customer loyalty for multiple years in a row. It has also received honors for reliability, service training, and easy maintenance.


This brand is praised most for cost-effectiveness of its machines. Konica Minolta creates a copier that will perform well for any size of business, for a price that is attainable even for businesses with budget concerns. The copier speed is impressive for that low of a price.


This is another way that the Konica Minolta copier company strives to put their customers first, by not taking advantage of them through inappropiate prices. These digital copiers are also known for their notable image quality, an essential feature for those who find copying to be a mandatory part of their business.


If there is a drawback to the Konica Minolta brand, it is the low resolution. For digital copiers in this price range and category, the resolution is poor and unimpressive. However, if your business does not rely on printing excellent pictures, you shouldn’t find this to be much of a problem.


That aside, Konica Minolta has proved itself to be one of the prominent digital copier brands, as well as a dependable service overall.